Yes. Accessibility compliance platforms include dashboards built to track remediation progress as work moves from identified issues to validated fixes. A dashboard pulls audit data, scan results, and issue statuses into one view, showing how many issues remain open, how many are in progress, and how many have been resolved. Teams use this view to monitor WCAG conformance over time, prioritize the next round of fixes, and report status to leadership without compiling spreadsheets manually.
| Element | What It Shows |
|---|---|
| Issue status | Open, in progress, fixed, validated, or reopened across the project. |
| WCAG breakdown | Issues grouped by success criterion and conformance level (2.1 AA or 2.2 AA). |
| Priority view | Issues ranked by user impact and risk factor. |
| Progress over time | Resolution rate, velocity, and remaining workload trended across weeks or months. |
| Reports | Exportable summaries for leadership, legal, and procurement reviews. |
What a Remediation Dashboard Tracks
A remediation dashboard centers on the lifecycle of an accessibility issue. Each issue carries a status, a WCAG success criterion, a location, a severity, and an assignee. The dashboard rolls these data points up into counts, percentages, and visualizations.
Most platforms display the total issue count alongside how many are open, in progress, fixed by the development team, and validated by an accessibility professional. Validation is the step that confirms a fix actually meets the success criterion. Without validation, a fix is only a claim.
Metrics That Indicate Real Progress
Issue counts alone do not tell the full story. The metrics that reflect meaningful movement toward WCAG conformance include:
- Resolution rate: percentage of identified issues moved to validated status over a given period.
- Open issues by priority: how many high-impact and high-risk issues remain unaddressed.
- Reopen rate: how often validated fixes regress or fail re-evaluation.
- Coverage: which pages, screens, or components have been audited and remediated versus those still pending.
- Time to fix: average days between issue identification and validated resolution.
How Audit Data Feeds the Dashboard
Audit reports are the primary source. When an accessibility professional completes an audit, the report lists every identified issue with its WCAG reference, location, and recommended fix. Platforms ingest this report and convert each line item into a tracked issue. From that point, every status change updates the dashboard automatically.
Scan data supplements the audit data on a recurring schedule. Scans flag approximately 25% of accessibility issues, so they catch regressions on previously fixed items and surface new issues introduced by code changes. The dashboard reflects both audit-identified issues and scan-flagged issues, with clear separation between the two sources.
Reporting From the Dashboard
Dashboards generate exportable reports for different audiences. Engineering teams need issue lists with code locations and remediation guidance. Project managers need timelines and resolution rates. Leadership and legal teams need summary views showing conformance progress against a target standard such as WCAG 2.1 AA.
Some platforms also produce documentation suitable for procurement, including data points that feed into a VPAT or ACR. The dashboard becomes the single source of truth that other accessibility deliverables reference.
Where Dashboards Fit in a Compliance Program
A remediation dashboard is most useful when paired with ongoing monitoring. Tracking progress on a fixed audit is the starting point. Tracking conformance as the product changes, with scheduled scans and periodic re-audits feeding back into the dashboard, is what keeps the work durable. Without that continuous loop, dashboard data ages quickly and stops reflecting the current state of the product.